Comparison
OpenAI vs Google Gemini Embeddings: Full Comparison (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of pricing, dimensions, quality, and how to migrate between OpenAI and Gemini embedding models without re-embedding.
Pricing Comparison
| Model | Provider | Dimensions | Price / 1M tokens |
|---|---|---|---|
text-embedding-3-small | OpenAI | 1536 | $0.02 |
text-embedding-3-large | OpenAI | 3072 | $0.13 |
text-embedding-ada-002 | OpenAI | 1536 | $0.10 |
gemini-embedding-001 | 768 | Free (under limits) | |
gemini-embedding-2 | 768 | Free (under limits) |
Google's Gemini embedding models are free under generous rate limits, making them an attractive alternative for teams looking to reduce embedding costs. OpenAI's models offer higher dimensions and established benchmark performance, but at a per-token cost.
Quality Comparison
Both providers produce high-quality embeddings for retrieval tasks. Key differences:
- OpenAI text-embedding-3-large — highest dimensional output (3072d), strong on MTEB benchmarks
- Gemini embedding-2 — 768d, optimized for Google's ecosystem, competitive retrieval quality
- Higher dimensions don't always mean better quality — task-specific evaluation matters
The Migration Problem
Switching from OpenAI to Gemini (or vice versa) isn't just an API call change. Vectors from different models live in different mathematical spaces. Even if two models output the same number of dimensions, their vectors are incompatible.
Traditionally, migration means re-embedding your entire corpus — which requires:
- Access to all original text (which you may not have stored)
- Paying for re-embedding millions of documents
- Downtime while vectors are being rebuilt
- Risk of quality degradation during the transition
How Schift Solves This
Schift uses learned projection matrices to map vectors from one model's space to another's — achieving 99.7% retrieval recovery without re-embedding a single document.
from schift import Schift
s = Schift(api_key="sk-...")
# Migrate your entire vector DB from OpenAI to Gemini
s.upgrade(
db="my_pgvector",
to="google/gemini-embedding-2"
)
# → 1M vectors migrated in 2.3s
# → Recovery: 99.7% | Verdict: SAFE Cost Savings: OpenAI → Gemini
| Scenario | OpenAI Cost | Gemini Cost | Savings |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1M tokens/month (3-small) | $0.02/mo | $0.00 | 100% |
| 100M tokens/month (3-small) | $2.00/mo | $0.00 | 100% |
| 1B tokens/month (3-large) | $130.00/mo | $0.00 | 100% |
| Via Schift (5% routing fee) | — | $0.00 + $0 | ~95%+ |
With Gemini's free tier and Schift's projection-based migration, teams can eliminate embedding costs entirely for most workloads without quality loss.
When to Stay on OpenAI
- You need 3072-dimensional embeddings for maximum precision
- Your benchmarks show significantly better performance on your specific domain
- You're already at scale and the cost difference is negligible
When to Switch to Gemini
- Cost is a factor — Gemini embeddings are free under rate limits
- 768 dimensions are sufficient for your use case (most are)
- You want to avoid single-provider dependency
- You're building a new project and want to start cost-effectively
Try It: Migrate in 3 Lines
pip install schift
from schift import Schift
s = Schift(api_key="sk-...")
# Test migration quality before committing
report = s.bench.run(
source="openai/text-embedding-3-small",
target="google/gemini-embedding-2"
)
print(report) # Recovery: 99.7% | Verdict: SAFE Switch from OpenAI to Gemini today
Migrate your vectors without re-embedding. Test quality before committing.
Start migration check